Original
Literary translation
§ 15.1
Nūllī per tōtum orbem terrārum cīvēs libentius quam Rōmānī sē patriae dedērunt .
Nowhere in the whole world have citizens devoted themselves to their country more willingly than the Romans.
Note 15.1
Nulli cives is the nominative plural subject. Per totum orbem terrarum means throughout the entire world; terrarum is genitive plural. Se patriae dare takes a reflexive accusative and dative, literally to give oneself to the fatherland. Libentius is comparative adverb.
§ 15.2
Alteram fābulam vōbīs dē fortī Rōmānō nārrābō .
I shall tell you another story about a brave Roman.
Note 15.2
Alteram fabulam is the accusative object of narrabo; vobis is indirect-object dative plural; de forti Romano requires the ablative.
§ 15.3
Prīmō Bellō Pūnicō diū Rōmānī ā Poenīs superābantur , quia paucās nāvēs , nec magnum nāvium ūsum habēbant .
During the First Punic War the Romans were long defeated by the Carthaginians, because they had few ships and little experience using ships.
Note 15.3
Primo Bello Punico is an ablative of time. Superabantur is imperfect passive; a Poenis marks the personal agent. Magnum navium usum means extensive experience of naval operations; navium is genitive plural dependent on usum.
§ 15.4
Sed tandem Rōmānī nāvēs optimās aedificāvērunt , et Poenōs plūrimīs proeliīs superāvērunt .
But at last the Romans built excellent ships and defeated the Carthaginians in many battles.
Note 15.4
Poenos is accusative direct object. Plurimis proeliis is ablative indicating the battles in which the victories occurred; both aedificaverunt and superaverunt are perfect indicatives.
§ 15.5
Itaque Rēgulum cōnsulem ad Āfricam cum exercitū mīsērunt .
And so they sent the consul Regulus with an army to Africa.
Note 15.5
Regulum is the direct object; consulem is an appositional accusative identifying his office. Cum exercitu takes an ablative, and ad Africam expresses direction.
§ 15.6
Rēgulus exercitum in Āfricam terram exposuit .
Regulus landed his army on African soil.
Note 15.6
Exposuit here means disembarked or landed, not explained. Exercitum is the object; in Africam terram with accusatives expresses movement onto African land, an unusual but intelligible formulation preserved from Reed.
§ 15.7
Prīmō rēs bene gessit ; agrōs ferrō et ignī vastāvit , et magnā spē Carthāginem contendit .
At first he campaigned successfully; he laid waste the fields with sword and fire, and advanced toward Carthage full of great hope.
Note 15.7
Res bene gerere is an idiom, to manage affairs or conduct operations successfully. Ferro et igni are ablatives of means; magna spe is an ablative of accompanying attitude. Carthaginem is accusative of destination without a preposition.
§ 15.8
Intereā Poenī summīs vīribus cōpiās colligēbant , et multa mīlia peditum equitumque in Rōmānōs dūxērunt .
Meanwhile the Carthaginians were gathering forces with all their strength and led many thousands of foot soldiers and horsemen against the Romans.
Note 15.8
Summis viribus is ablative of means/manner. Milia is an accusative plural numeral noun, modified by multa; peditum equitumque are genitive plurals specifying thousands of whom. The enclitic -que means and. In Romanos indicates hostile movement.
§ 15.9
Ācriter pugnābant Rōmānī , sed nōn diū hostium impetum sustinēbant .
The Romans fought fiercely, but could not withstand the enemy assault for long.
Note 15.9
Hostium is a genitive plural modifying impetum. Pugnabant and sustinebant are imperfect indicatives, portraying the ongoing battle; non diu limits the duration of resistance.
They were thrown into confusion and routed.
Note 15.10
Perturbati and fugati are masculine nominative plural perfect passive participles, jointly forming perfect passive predicates with sunt; the unexpressed subject is the Roman soldiers.
§ 15.11
Paucī salūtem fugā petīvērunt , et ad oppidum amīcum cucurrērunt .
A few sought safety in flight and ran to a friendly town.
Note 15.11
Pauci is substantive nominative masculine plural; salutem is accusative. Fuga is ablative of means, omitted by AcademiaLatin but present in the printed OCR and Fabulae Faciles. Ad oppidum amicum marks destination.
§ 15.12
Maior pars exercitūs aut necātī aut captī sunt .
The greater part of the army were either killed or captured.
Note 15.12
Maior pars is formally feminine nominative singular, with exercitus a genitive singular fourth-declension noun. The masculine nominative plural necati/capti and plural sunt show agreement according to sense with the soldiers constituting that part, not formal agreement with pars. This irregularity is retained, not silently emended.
§ 15.13
Inter captīvōs Rēgulus ipse Carthāginem ductus est .
Among the captives, Regulus himself was taken to Carthage.
Note 15.13
Inter requires accusative captivos. Regulus ipse is nominative; ductus est is a perfect passive. Carthaginem expresses motion toward a city without a preposition.
§ 15.14
Tum summō gaudiō Poenī , “Nunc ,” inquiunt , “Rōmānōs vīcimus ; Rōmānī igitur pācem dēsīderābunt et bonās condiciōnēs ferent .”
Then the Carthaginians, filled with great joy, said: “Now we have defeated the Romans; so the Romans will want peace and will offer favorable terms.”
Note 15.14
Summo gaudio is ablative of cause or manner. Inquiunt is a present-tense reporting verb within past narration. Vicimus is first-person plural perfect. Desiderabunt and ferent are futures; ferre condiciones means to propose terms.
§ 15.15
“Tē , Rēgule , Rōmam iam mittēmus .”
“We shall now send you, Regulus, to Rome.”
Note 15.15
Regule is vocative singular; Te is accusative direct object. Romam is accusative of destination and corrects OCR Roman (final n for m). Mittemus is first-person plural future.
§ 15.16
“Tū lēgātī modo in Senātum intrā —sī verbīs tuīs animōs cīvium tuōrum ad pācem addūxerīs , tū vinculīs līberāberis , et liber in līberā urbe tua habitābis .”
“Enter the Senate in the manner of an envoy. If you persuade your fellow citizens to make peace by your words, you will be released from your chains and live as a free man in your free city.”
Note 15.16
Legati is genitive singular dependent on modo (ablative of manner), not nominative or dative. Intra is imperative of intro, not the preposition intra. Adduxeris is future perfect indicative in a future conditional, though identical in form to perfect subjunctive; liberaberis is future passive, and vinculis its ablative of separation. Liber is nominative predicate adjective, in contrast to libera urbe (ablative of location).
§ 15.17
“Sed sī Rōmānī nōn ad pācem amīcitiamque adductī erunt , sed malās condiciōnēs ferent , et Poenōs odiō īrāque petent , tū nōn in urbe tuā manēbis , sed Carthāginem iterum veniēs , et vinculīs mortīque crūdēlī tē trādēs .”
“But if the Romans do not agree to peace and friendship, but offer unfavorable terms and pursue the Carthaginians with hatred and anger, you will not remain in your city; instead you will return to Carthage and surrender yourself to chains and a cruel death.”
Note 15.17
Adducti erunt is future perfect passive in the protasis: literally if they shall not have been led to peace. Condiciones ferent means offer terms. Odio iraque are ablatives of feeling/instrument; petent here means attack or pursue. Vinculis mortique crudeli are datives with trades, not ablatives of separation; mortique contains -que. Carthaginem is accusative of destination.
§ 15.18
Rēgulus igitur Poenīs fidem dedit , et ad patriam celerrimē revertit .
Regulus therefore gave the Carthaginians his word and returned home as quickly as possible.
Note 15.18
Poenis is an indirect-object dative plural; fidem dare means to pledge one’s word. Revertit here is a perfect-tense narrative form of revertor/reverto (returned). Ad patriam marks motion toward homeland.
§ 15.19
Sed ubi Senātum intrāvit , nōn ad pācem amīcitiamque cīvēs suōs addūxit .
But when he entered the Senate, he did not persuade his fellow citizens to accept peace and friendship.
Note 15.19
Ubi is a temporal conjunction. Senatum and cives suos are accusative objects of intravit and adduxit respectively; ad pacem amicitiamque marks the outcome he refused to promote.
§ 15.20
“Nunc ,” inquit , “superātī sunt Rōmānī ; malās condiciōnēs ferent Poenī .”
“The Romans have now been defeated,” he said; “the Carthaginians will offer harsh terms.”
Note 15.20
Superati sunt is perfect passive with Romani as subject, not a present adjectival predicate. Ferent is future indicative and condiciones is its direct object.
§ 15.21
“Vōs autem meliōrēs fortiōrēsque estis hostibus ; sī igitur bellum summīs vīribus gerētis , et virōs vōs praebebitis , mox vōs victōrēs eritis et vestrās condiciōnēs hostibus ferētis .”
“But you are better and braver than your enemies; if you wage war with all your strength and prove yourselves men, soon you will be victors and impose your own terms on the enemy.”
Note 15.21
Meliores and fortioresque are comparative nominative plurals with vos; hostibus is ablative of comparison. Geretis, praebebitis, eritis and feretis are all futures in a future-more-vivid condition. Viros is a predicate accusative alongside vos (show yourselves men). Vestras condiciones is object of feretis and hostibus dative recipient.
§ 15.22
“Ego Carthāginem nāvigābō nec fidem violābō .”
“I shall sail to Carthage and I shall not break my word.”
Note 15.22
Carthaginem is accusative of destination; navigabo and violabo are first-person singular futures. Fidem here means a pledged promise, not religious faith.
§ 15.23
“Vōs animōs ad bellum firmāte et hostēs sub pedibus prōsternite .”
“Steel your spirits for war and lay the enemy low beneath your feet.”
Note 15.23
Vos is an emphatic nominative plural subject of two second-person plural imperatives, firmate and prosternite. Animos and hostes are their accusative objects. Sub pedibus indicates location and therefore takes ablative.
§ 15.24
“Ego nec vincula nec mortem recūsō , sed vestrō amōre mē dignum praebēbō .”
“I shrink from neither chains nor death, but I shall show myself worthy of your love.”
Note 15.24
Vincula and mortem are accusative objects of recuso. Vestro amore is ablative with dignum; me and dignum form an object–predicate adjective construction after praebebo.
§ 15.25
Deinde Rēgulus fidem nōn violāvit , sed vultū serēnō Rōmā discessit et Carthāginem revertit .
Then Regulus kept his word: he left Rome with a calm expression and returned to Carthage.
Note 15.25
Fidem non violavit is a litotes-like straightforward denial, he did not break his promise. Vultu sereno is ablative of accompanying circumstance; Roma is ablative of separation without a preposition, whereas Carthaginem is accusative destination.
§ 15.26
Ibi vinculīs mortīque sē trādidit .
There he surrendered himself to chains and death.
Note 15.26
Vinculis and mortique are dative plural and dative singular respectively, governed by tradidit; se is reflexive accusative direct object. The -que enclitic joins death to chains.
§ 15.27
Atquī sciēbat quae sibi barbarus tortor parāret ; nōn aliter tamen dimōvit obstantēs propinquōs et populum reditūs morantem , quam sī clientum longa negōtia dīiūdicātā līte relinqueret , tendēns Venāfrānōs in agrōs aut Lacedaemonium Tarentum .
Yet he knew what the barbarous torturer was preparing for him; nevertheless he brushed aside his obstructing relatives and the crowd delaying his return, as though, a lawsuit settled, he were leaving behind his clients’ lengthy business and setting out for the fields of Venafrum or Spartan Tarentum.
Note 15.27
Horace, Odes 3.5.49–56: Atqui introduces the contrast. Quae ... pararet is an indirect question with imperfect subjunctive pararet. Sibi is dative of disadvantage. Obstantes and morantem are present active participles modifying accusative objects of dimovit. Reditus is accusative plural of the fourth-declension noun reditus (returns), the object of morantem. Quam si governs imperfect subjunctive relinqueret in a hypothetical comparison; diiudicata lite is an ablative absolute; tendens is nominative singular agreeing with the understood Regulus, Venafranos agrees with agros, Lacedaemonium with Tarentum.