Original
Literary translation
§ 8.1
Inter deōs Rōmānōs agricolae nōn sōlum Cererem sed Bacchum quoque adōrābant et in summō honōre habēbant .
Among the Roman gods, farmers worshipped not only Ceres but Bacchus too, and held him in the highest honor.
Note 8.1
Inter governs the accusative deos Romanos. Agricolae is nominative plural. Non solum ... sed ... quoque = “not only ... but also”. Cererem and Bacchum are accusative objects of adorabant. In summo honore habere is an idiom, “hold in the highest esteem”; summo honore is ablative after in.
§ 8.2
Bacchus enim vīnum hominibus dedit et multās artēs docuit .
For Bacchus gave wine to human beings and taught many skills.
Note 8.2
Enim introduces an explanation. Bacchus nominative subject; vinum accusative object of perfect dedit, hominibus dative indirect object. Multas artes is accusative object of perfect docuit; the people receiving the instruction are understood from context.
§ 8.3
Ad Bacchī ārās agricolae dōna multa , et in prīmīs ūvās vīnumque iūcundum , ferēbant , et ārās flōribus laetīs pampinīsque ōrnābant .
To Bacchus’s altars the farmers brought many gifts, especially grapes and delightful wine, and decorated the altars with bright flowers and vine leaves.
Note 8.3
Ad governs accusative aras, modified by genitive Bacchi. Dona multa and uvas vinumque iucundum are accusative objects of ferebant; in primis = “especially”. The second aras is accusative object of ornabant. Floribus laetis and pampinisque are ablatives of means; -que on vinum and pampinis joins coordinated nouns. Ferebant and ornabant are imperfects describing habitual worship.
§ 8.4
Deus igitur vītēs Ītalicās cūrābat , et ā perīculō dēfendēbat .
Therefore the god cared for Italian vines and defended them from danger.
Note 8.4
Deus is nominative subject of both imperfect verbs. Vites Italicas is accusative feminine plural object of curabat and understood with defendebat. A periculo is ablative after a, indicating protection from danger.
§ 8.5
Fōrmōsus erat Deus , et , quod vītēs amābat , capillōs suōs pampinīs saepe ōrnābat .
The god was handsome, and because he loved vines, he often adorned his own hair with vine leaves.
Note 8.5
Formosus is nominative masculine singular predicate adjective with Deus. Quod introduces a causal clause (“because”). Vites and capillos suos are accusative objects. Pampinis is ablative of means (“with vine leaves”); suos is reflexive possessive referring back to the god.
§ 8.6
Nec Italōs Graecōsque sōlum docēbat , sed ad longinquās terrās nāvigābat , aliīsque gentibus vīnum dabat , artēsque rūsticās docēbat .
He taught not only Italians and Greeks, but sailed to distant lands, gave wine to other peoples, and taught them farming skills.
Note 8.6
Nec ... solum ... sed forms “not only ... but ...” with nec having negative force; Italos Graecosque are accusative personal objects of docebat. Ad governs accusative longinquas terras. Aliis gentibus is dative plural with dabat; vinum accusative. Artesque rusticas is accusative object of the second docebat, with -que joining the further activity. The recipients of the skills are understood.
§ 8.7
Deus , ubi trāns mare Aegaeum quondam nāvigābat , ad īnsulam parvam nāvem gubernāvit , et errōribus longīs fessus , sē in ōrā maritimā prōstrāvit et somnō placidō corpus animumque recreābat .
Once, while the god was sailing across the Aegean Sea, he steered his ship to a small island; tired from long wanderings, he lay down on the shore and refreshed his body and spirit with peaceful sleep.
Note 8.7
Ubi with imperfect navigabat gives a temporal background (“while”). Trans governs accusative mare Aegaeum; ad governs accusative insulam parvam. Navem is accusative object of perfect gubernavit. Erroribus longis is ablative of cause with nominative masculine singular fessus. Se is reflexive accusative object of prostravit; in ora maritima is ablative place where. Somno placido is ablative of means; corpus and animumque are objects of imperfect recreabat, with -que = “and”. The movement from perfects to imperfect recreabat is retained from Reed.
§ 8.8
Mox autem pīrātae quoque , malī hominēs , nāvem ad īnsulam impulērunt .
Soon, however, pirates too—wicked men—drove a ship toward the island.
Note 8.8
Piratae is nominative plural subject, with nominative apposition mali homines. Navem accusative direct object, ad insulam accusative after ad for destination. Impulerunt is perfect indicative, 3rd plural.
§ 8.9
Ubi iuvenem fōrmōsum in ōrā vīdērunt , tum vērō magnō gaudiō , “Ecce !” inquiunt , “nōn sine praedā ad patriam nostram nāvigābimus .
When they saw the handsome young man on the shore, then in great delight they said, “Look! We shall not sail home without plunder.
Note 8.9
Ubi + viderunt marks prior discovery, followed by the dramatic present inquiunt (“they say”), switching narrative tense. Iuvenem formosum is accusative object of viderunt; in ora is locative ablative. Magno gaudio is ablative of manner/cause (“with great joy”). Sine governs ablative praeda. Ad patriam nostram takes accusative. Navigabimus is future indicative first-person plural.
§ 8.10
Hominem raptabimus et in nāvem fūrtim impōnēmus , tum cito cum captīvō ad Āfricam nāvem impellēmus .
We shall seize the man and secretly put him aboard the ship; then we shall quickly sail the ship to Africa with our captive.
Note 8.10
Raptabimus, imponemus and impellemus are future indicative first-person plural. Hominem is accusative object of raptabimus and the understood object of imponemus; in navem is accusative of movement into. Cum captivo takes ablative; ad Africam takes accusative; navem is accusative object of impellemus.
§ 8.11
Āfricae incolae servōs dēsīderant , et pecūniam multam nōbīs dabunt , sī nōs iuvenem tam pulchrum trādiderīmus .”
The inhabitants of Africa want slaves and will give us a great deal of money if we hand over such a handsome young man.”
Note 8.11
Africae is genitive singular modifying nominative plural incolae; servos is accusative object of present desiderant. Pecuniam multam is accusative direct object, nobis dative recipient of future dabunt. Si introduces a future-more-vivid condition; tradiderimus is FUTURE PERFECT indicative first plural in context, not perfect subjunctive. Nos nominative subject; iuvenem tam pulchrum accusative object.
§ 8.12
Tum pīrātae , malī ignāvīque hominēs , deum raptāvērunt et in nāvem imposuērunt ; nec tamen iuvenem fessum ē somnō excitāvērunt .
Then the pirates, wicked and cowardly men, seized the god and put him aboard the ship; yet they did not wake the exhausted young man from his sleep.
Note 8.12
Mali ignavique homines is nominative plural apposition to piratae. Deum accusative object of both perfect raptaverunt and imposuerunt; in navem is accusative motion toward/into. Nec tamen = “and yet not”. Iuvenem fessum accusative object of excitaverunt. E somno takes ablative, “out of sleep”.
§ 8.13
Ubi autem Bacchus ē somnō sē excitāvit , et undās caeruleās undique vīdit , tum nec īrātus nec perterritus , “Nōn ego ,” inquit , “stultōs ignāvōsque timeō ; mox tamen pīrātae nūmen meum vidēbunt et vehementer timēbunt .”
But when Bacchus awoke from sleep and saw blue waves all around, neither angry nor frightened, he said, “I do not fear fools and cowards; soon, however, the pirates will see my divine power and be terribly afraid.”
Note 8.13
E somno is ablative after e; se is reflexive accusative object of excitavit. Undas caeruleas is accusative feminine plural object of vidit, not nominative. Nec iratus nec perterritus are nominative masculine singular predicates describing Bacchus. Non ego ... timeo is interrupted direct speech with emphatic ego; stultos ignavosque are accusative plural substantivized adjectives (the pirates). Piratae is nominative subject of future videbunt and timebunt; numen meum accusative object of videbunt.
§ 8.14
Tum ē mediā nāve vītis flōrēbat et in altum ascendēbat .
Then a vine sprang into bloom from the middle of the ship and climbed high into the air.
Note 8.14
E media nave is ablative of origin after e. Vitis nominative feminine singular subject; florebat and ascendebat are imperfect indicative third singular. In altum is accusative of direction or extension (“aloft, upward”), not an ablative location.
§ 8.15
Ē vīte rāmī , ē rāmīs pampinī flōrēbant , et dē summīs rāmīs ūvae purpureae pendēbant .
From the vine branches blossomed, from the branches vine leaves, and from the highest branches purple grapes hung.
Note 8.15
E vite and e ramis are ablatives after e; the first florebant serves both the ellipsis “e vite rami [florebant]” and the expressed “e ramis pampini florebant”. Rami and pampini are masculine nominative plural subjects; de summis ramis is ablative of source; uvae purpureae is nominative feminine plural subject of pendebant. All three verbs are imperfect.
§ 8.16
Nōn iam candida erant vēla , sed lūce purpureā fulgēbant .
The sails were white no longer, but shone with a purple light.
Note 8.16
Vela is nominative neuter plural subject of both erant and fulgebant; candida nominative neuter plural predicative adjective. Luce purpurea is ablative of manner/means, “with purple light”. Non iam means “no longer”.
§ 8.17
Ubi nautae vītem mīram in mediā nāve vīdērunt , tum magnō timōre Deum spectāvērunt ; capillī in capitibus horruērunt .
When the sailors saw the wondrous vine in the middle of the ship, they gazed at the god in great fear; the hair on their heads stood on end.
Note 8.17
Nautae is nominative plural subject of perfect viderunt and spectaverunt; vitem miram is accusative object, and in media nave ablative location. Magno timore is ablative of cause/manner. Deum is accusative object of spectaverunt. Capilli nominative plural subject of perfect horruerunt; in capitibus is ablative location.
§ 8.18
Subitō ex undīs tigrēs leōnēsque saevī in nāvem ascendērunt et in nautās perterritōs cucurrērunt .
Suddenly fierce tigers and lions climbed from the waves onto the ship and charged at the terrified sailors.
Note 8.18
Ex undis is ablative of origin; tigres (common/feminine) and leonesque masculine are coordinated nominative plural subjects. Saevi is masculine nominative plural and may characterize the joined group (or specifically leones). In navem governs accusative motion onto; in nautas perterritos governs accusative toward/against. Ascenderunt and cucurrerunt are perfect third plural.
§ 8.19
Pīrātae , terrōris plēnī , ē nāve in mare sē prōstrāvērunt .
The pirates, full of terror, threw themselves from the ship into the sea.
Note 8.19
Piratae nominative plural subject; terroris genitive singular complement of pleni, nominative masculine plural adjective. E nave takes ablative of motion from; in mare takes accusative of motion into. Se accusative reflexive object of perfect prostraverunt.
§ 8.20
Deinde Iuppiter propter misericordiam hominēs in delphīnās convertit .
Then Jupiter, moved by pity, transformed the men into dolphins.
Note 8.20
Iuppiter nominative singular subject; homines accusative plural object of perfect convertit; in delphinas accusative of the resulting state/transformation. Propter governs accusative misericordiam. Reed names Jupiter as agent, even though a familiar ancient variant gives the transformation to Dionysus/Bacchus; do not emend Reed based on mythology.
§ 8.21
Intereā Neptūnus vēla purpurea ventīs secundīs implēvit , et sōlus sub vitium umbra Bacchus ad terrās longinquās nāvigāvit .
Meanwhile Neptune filled the purple sails with favorable winds, and Bacchus sailed alone to distant lands beneath the shade of the vines.
Note 8.21
Neptunus nominative subject; vela purpurea accusative neuter plural object of perfect implevit, ventis secundis ablative of means/content. Solus nominative masculine singular modifies Bacchus. Sub takes ablative umbra here (“under the shade”); vitium is GENITIVE PLURAL of vitis (“of vines”), not vitium “fault” or accusative of a singular noun. Ad takes accusative terras longinquas, after perfect navigavit.